![]() |
![]() |
| Guildford Liberal Democrats | <info@guildfordlibdems.org.uk> |
Dismay as Borough Council agrees to 6,400 extra houses for Guildford12.00.00am BST (GMT +0100) Thu 13th Oct 2005 Liberal Democrat councillors expressed dismay at last night's decision of Guildford Borough Council's Executive Committee to accept a proposal for 6,400 extra houses to be built in the borough over the next 20 years. The Conservative Executive was responding to a consultation on housing distribution in Surrey that forms part of the draft South East Plan. At last night's meeting, the Executive agreed to support the County Council's 'preferred option', which is for Guildford to deliver 320 dwellings per year over the next 20 years, a total of 6,400 extra homes within the urban areas and the villages by 2026. At the meeting, Cllr Jenny Wicks (Con, Clandon and Horsley) admitted that Guildford's average rate of house-building over the last five years was only 297 per year, and that this average had been boosted by the large number of new homes built on redundant MoD land in Queen Elizabeth Park in Stoughton. Nevertheless, Cllr Wicks said "Our officers are confident that we can meet these figures." The Executive rejected both alternative proposals, which would have meant building in the green belt. Speaking after the meeting, Cllr Merilyn Spier (Lib Dem, Merrow), Liberal Democrat spokesperson on planning policy, said "I am dismayed that the Executive have meekly agreed to the County Council's proposal to cram so many extra houses into our town and villages. We all believe that the green belt must be protected, but that's no excuse for giving in to County Council pressure which could ruin our town and the quality of life for everyone. This whole consultation exercise is flawed. We have been given a false choice, and we should protest vigorously." The Executive agreed to express concern that infrastructure such as transport, utilities and social and community facilities would be needed to support the extra houses, and were worried that high-density development would change the character of the town. Cllr Wicks admitted that "Building more houses will bring more pressure" and proposed to ask for targets for infrastructure. Cllr Vivienne Johnson (Lib Dem, Christchurch) commented after the meeting "Calling for targets on infrastructure is a mere fig leaf to cover a total surrender to County and government demands. The county's figure of 320 extra houses per year is based on super-high density development which could ruin the character of our historic town and concrete over many of our green gardens and open spaces. Our response should be an emphatic NO to so many extra houses." Liberal Democrat councillors propose to 'call-in' the Executive's decision for further discussion at the Environment Scrutiny Committee on 24 October.
Bookmark this story at:
Related News Stories:Mon 5th Apr 2010: Dismay at Guildford House decision. Fri 12th Mar 2010: Council decision on Guildford House wrong in every way. Mon 1st Mar 2010: The future of Guildford House - Lib Dems call-in Council decision. Wed 24th Feb 2010: Widespread dismay over Council's proposal to dispose of historic Guildford House Gallery. Fri 11th Apr 2008: Guildford Write-off £102,000 in Council Tax. Sat 22nd Sep 2007: Borough finally agrees to tunnel safety improvements. Thu 22nd Feb 2007: Guildford Tories reject Lib Dem call for zero council tax rise. Mon 4th Jul 2005: Guildford challenges County Council on waste contract. Sun 4th Jul 2004: Published and promoted by Guildford Liberal Democrats, The Hall, 53a Woking Road, Guildford, Surrey GU1 1QD. The views expressed are those of the party, not of the service provider. |